Arpad Miklos Does "Straight-for-Pay"
If you've been reading QC long enough you know how aggravated some of readers get whenever vagina, Jake Cruise, Cody Cummings, barebacking, or gay-for-pay comes up. Well, those readers are gonna have an aneurism when they read this. In celebration of their 4th anniversary, Jake Cruise Media featured hung uncut hairy top daddy, Arpad Miklos, in his first "straight-for-pay" scene.
What's "straight-for-pay" you ask? Well, it's kinda like what Cody Cummings and Pat Bateman do; but instead of paying a self-proclaimed "straight" guy to fool around with guys, you pay a self-proclaimed "gay" guy to fool around with girls. Arpad's scene with blond starlet Holly Heart is currently up at Straight Guys For Gay Eyes. XBIZ has more about the business details, but Arpad's switch brings up some very interesting issues:
1) "Straight-for-pay" is gonna be the next big thing in bi porn - Bisexuals exist and even gay guys will enjoy seeing their favorite stars in action (chick or no). SG4GE.com already films straight scenes with a gay audience in mind, so the lure (ie. $$$ and buzz) will surely snag other big name stars.
2) The "gay-for-pay" label's gonna start meaning even less - After blowing a load on Holly's back, Arpad reminds fans that he's still gay. After Cody Cummings blows a load from a "brojob" he reminds fans that he's still straight. Maybe Gore Vidal was right when he said, "There are no homosexual people, only homosexual acts." QC could give two farts about labels, so maybe when everyone just starts fucking whoever they want whenever they want, we can all move past the idea of labels, "gay" or "straight" entirely. Wouldn't that be nice?
3) Idealism aside, fans are still gonna be pissed - OK, OK, OK... so Arpad also didn't wear a condom for his "straight" scene, which he always does for dudes. Barebacking's par for the course when it comes to Jake Cruise, so it's not a HUGE surprise that Arpad didn't. But that on top of having straight sex will surely disgust some of Arpad's biggest fans. Lots of porn stars will have to decide whether or not to go the "straight-for-pay" route, knowing that they risk blowing their gay rep and disappointing fans if they let a chick blow them first.
We'll let you have a field day in the QComments. As for us, we simply say, if you don't like it, don't watch it.
6
QC Asians
Reader Comments
Your 2¢, in chronological order — add your comment below.
Yeah, I won't support barebacking. And I won't support Arpad's videos until he finally bottoms on screen.
As a bisexual (don't ask me to explain it -- I am what I am) I do find the SG4GE site hot. But when I see a gay guy fucking a chick -- I want to see that same guy getting fucked.
I'm gay and in high school and college I used to fuck women too, so have alot of other gay men. I have several friends who were married for years and have several childern.So tell me what is so unusual about this. I think it's just so silly and leave it to JC to think of this. So if lables don't exist anymore will everyone just be sexual vagabonds, I take alot of pride saying I'm GAY.
Don't really see the point, but yeah whatever. I surely won't watch it. Funny thing is I don't have a problem with straight porn, even watch it when I run out of good gay porn. But the fantasy portrayal of a guy switching to the "other" gender is not exactly a turn on as a gay male that likes males too much too indulge in this particular fantasy. may seem like a double standard as most of us would have no issue with the reverse, a guy going from straight sex to gay sex, but given who's to benefit from that, that should be expected. Given that Jake seems to want to be seems as some avant garde porn producer, I'm not really surprised by this.
Thanks, QC! Another gay site with no soul. Of course you don't care. Why would you? It's all about the Benjamins. I just knew you guys weren't going to touch this. But, you did. And, you don't care. So, why don't you take down the comments? If our opinion doesn't matter to you, then stop asking for comments. And stand for something, for god's sake. Where has the pride gone in being fucking gay (i.e. not fucking women). Sure there will always be weird ass queers that will fuck anything, throw "labels" to the wind. Hmmmm, let's see how well that will work in the real world. No psychology/psychiatry. No social work/sociology. No anthropology. Hell, you might as well throw the medical field in there as well. Why? Because they ALL label people. Labeling is a part of the human psyche, cognitive reality. Our brains are wired to label. It's NORMAL! It's a part of how we solve problems, reach solutions, and diagnose ailments. Oh, hell, this is so stupid. Let this dumb-ass do whatever he wants to do and say he's "gay." He is in the death throws of his porn career (I hope); so, this childish, sophomoric behavior will hopefully put an end to it. I guess I am rare breed of gay man who finds exclusive relationships with men normal, good, something to be proud of/virtuous. No wonder the tards in society call us freaks of nature.
And, if this is the future of "gay" porn, then the future is about as bright as whale shit in the Marianas Trench.
Oh, yes, what a glorious day it will be when we have no labels (sarcasm). Be mindful of what you say, QC. I don't want to bring politics into this porn debate (debacle), but your hubris about labels borderlines on being anti-gay. Some of us are actually quite (fiercely) proud of being labeled gay. And I personally don't appreciate this blog's editors insinuating that there is something wrong with that. If you think being bisexual (aka "label free") is superior to being gay, then just say it. I guess we inferior, less enlightened gay guys will have to live outside the circle...again.
This is a turn off - not a moral or gay rights issue, above commentator. Your post was over the top. Ultimately, this is a reflection of Jake Cruise's vivid imagination, nothing else.