Chaos Men: Elliott and Nash - RAW
Nash last worked with donkey-dicked Davin, and was here visiting to do two scenes. Bryan promised him after taking Davin's big cock, that he could top all he wanted, and that Elliott would eagerly take his dick. He knew his ass would need a break.
Elliott has discovered that making straight guys cum during the Serviced videos is REALLY hard to do, so Bryan thinks he was eager to get some full-on action.
See All of the action on QCX!

5













QC Asians





Reader Comments
Your 2¢, in chronological order — add your comment below.
NEED TO GET BACK to the way CHAOSMEN USE to be you NOW HAVE SEVERAL VIDS FOR MORE RAW MADNESS. When will the insanity END. IT Doesn't have to be RAW every WEEK LOSES ITS APPEAL AFTER AWHILE.
GREAT LOVE IT!!!!
I've read of lot of dramatic comments on bareback, but "Meh'", your comment takes the cake. You're not even arguing from the typical "health" angle, you are simply arguing taste. Even the rabid condom brigade won't claim that sex without a condom, is visually less appealing than sex WITH one.
If you dont agree with sex/porn without condoms then just scroll on past - this is a porn site and no one wants to listen to your boring and repetitive statements, arguments or morals every week. Just go to a different forum that actually gives a shit about that, and have your say there - but not here. This is a place were we come to enjoy porn, and there is no doubt that Chaos make great porn, you are clearly in the wrong place to discuss morals, health or ethics, this is a porn site simple as that. Presumably you are here to get your nuts off and didnt come here to lecture us all - we are all quite aware of the risks and dangers thanks very much, but we arent interested in what you have to say just too busy getting off on the porn. Good bye and have a lovely day.
Well done Krips. I've read some pretty ignorant comments, but yours takes the biscuit.
Yes Chaosmen is a just a porn site. And so is Queerclick. We all come here to get our rocks off.
But are you so obsessed in getting that quick fix of porn, that you don't give a damn about the performers? Unprotected sex carries risks - period! Every time the performers have sex with difference people bareback, they increase the risk.
These are real people, not cartoons and the risks they take are potentially life-threatening. If we lived in an ideal world where there was no risk of catching HIV, chlamydia or syphilis, then I'd be all for no condoms. But that is not the case.
Porn is not in itself immoral. However, subscribing to providers who allow their stars to take this type of risk certainly is morally questionable