QC FYI: A Transgender Gene?

In a groundbreaking study, Australian scientists analyzed the DNA of 112 male-to-female transsexual volunteers and identified a link between a gene involved in testosterone. Quoted from the study: "[T]hey were more likely to have a longer version of the androgen receptor gene.... It is known that longer versions of the androgen receptor gene are associated with less efficient testosterone signalling.
"This reduced action of the male sex hormone may have an effect on gender development in the womb, the researchers speculated.
"We think that these genetic differences might reduce testosterone action and under masculinise the brain during foetal development," said researcher Lauren Hare from Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research.
This raises a few interesting issues. First off, homosexuality and transgender identity were only removed from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in the 20th century. Even though some ignorant people still think that homosexuality is a biological perversion, mental illness, or a choice, others feel ambivalent about proving a genetic basis for sexual orientation. Those in support of finding a gay gene think it will validate the legitimacy homosexual as not being a choice. Meanwhile, others worry that identifying a gay gene will result in eugenics (with people wanting to identify homos based purely on DNA and treating them accordingly or even wiping them out).
Consider your own attitudes towards transgender people... How much do you think you have in common with them? What if it turns out that their being transgender is not so different from being gay? If we all have in common a genetic basis, how does our understanding of community change? As the human genome continues to be decoded, it seems we're shifting our understanding of human behavior and self-perception from an environment and psychological basis to a one in genetic biology. Whether it pushes us closer together or further apart remains to be seen...
But also think of this... if we're genetically inclined towards a certain body types, gender identifications, physical cravings, and other behaviors, how far down does that rabbit hole go? Apparently, the natural self sometimes manifests, no matter how a person is raised. But could genetics also explain how more minute idiosyncrasies that make up someone's personality? Like how why some people clean to de-stress, why others love video games, why some people sleep on their sides, while others enjoy cheese crackers? How much of ourselves is linked to genetics? Maybe a lot more than we thought.
What do you think?
2













QC Asians





Reader Comments
Your 2¢, in chronological order — add your comment below.
Maybe it really all has to do with what the soul (or whatever you want to call it) is that's inhabiting the body. A gal soul is going to be a gal no matter what the body is. And it won't really matter what the genetics are one way or the other.
Speaking for myself, i tend to get tired of it being assumed that i like being with guys because i'm really a gal inside. Well, i'm not. I know the stereotype is that i'm supposed to be. But i'm not. I'm a guy. A guy soul in a guy body. And i like being with other guys for the most obvious of all reasons: because i'm a guy. My male genetics as well as my male soul make me want to be with other males. I basically have nothing in common with gals. They're too alien. I have no problem at all working with gals for the mutual benefit of civilization and getting things done, but socially, they're as alien as could possibly be alien to me. The ways they think and act are incomprehensible to me because of their alien-ness. I'm not being snarky. I'm just stating the facts.
A gal is pretty obvious for what she is. That she may be currently existing in an outwardly guy body at the moment doesn't make any difference whatsoever as to what her true gender is. A gal is a gal is a gal. And i accept that's what she is. No static or disrespect from me ever about what body she's currently wearing.
Why not simply accept that a gal is who she is because that's what she is? Instead of trying to shoehorn her into whatever stereotype that happens to be the current social vogue? Who cares what her genetics are or what hormones she was exposed to or not during her fetal gestation? A gal is a gal is a gal.
...and a gay is gay is a gay! lolz