Prince William Frontal Nude QC reader Anthony sent this in and wanted our opinion on the authenticity of this shot. We thought it’s rather obvious but we’d throw this to the floor. What do you guys think? Fake or Real? More of #Prince William CategoriesEye Candy Famous Faces 10 Jul 07 By Editor D 75 Comments Ronaldinho Hard On!Pricky Martin 75 Comments stephen says: July 10, 2007 at 11:00 pm I believe it’s real however i don’t think it’s him Frank says: July 10, 2007 at 11:00 pm Coool david says: July 10, 2007 at 11:02 pm Totally fake. The face was pasted on. Gary says: July 10, 2007 at 11:13 pm Oh Please, Prince Williams cock would be much bigger and probably uncut jeremy says: July 10, 2007 at 11:17 pm fake… totally. Michael W. says: July 10, 2007 at 11:18 pm If it’s fake, it’s a good job. Could just be a kid who looks like the prince though… louis says: July 10, 2007 at 11:21 pm it is a fake. that is not his body. and it’s his face from years earlier. louis says: July 10, 2007 at 11:21 pm it is a fake. that is not his body. and it’s his face from years earlier. KPB says: July 10, 2007 at 11:22 pm Fake. There’s a ring of light going around the head. You;’ll notice it espcially near the front tip of the hair and his forehead. That’s a cut paste job at work. Plus, mor importantly, he’s british and I don’t see any foreskin! Geno says: July 10, 2007 at 11:22 pm Fake. The two young Princes would be uncut, in all likelihood. If not, there goes my fantasy. KPB says: July 10, 2007 at 11:22 pm Fake. There’s a ring of light going around the head. You’ll notice it especially near the front tip of the hair and his forehead. That’s a cut paste job at work. Plus, more importantly, he’s British and I don’t see any foreskin! ted says: July 10, 2007 at 11:24 pm Fake. He’s European, thus uncut. mark says: July 10, 2007 at 11:27 pm Absolutely fake! andre says: July 10, 2007 at 11:29 pm I wasn’t even looking at the fake penis… I’m just curious where you can still by Diet Rite… Liam says: July 10, 2007 at 11:31 pm Fake obviously, and rather insulting, his cock looks deformed! rick says: July 10, 2007 at 11:39 pm NOT AUTHENIC I SAW HIS BULDGE IN PERSON AND HE IS HUNG Tim says: July 10, 2007 at 11:42 pm I don’t see 12″ so it can’t possibly be a ruler (future ruler) spiffy says: July 10, 2007 at 11:56 pm Geez… Just go look at real pics of William — his neck is not that short. jayson says: July 10, 2007 at 11:58 pm Fake. Look where his head and neck meet, it’s just not right. And isn’t Diet Right soda kind of a discount brand, couldn’t a prince afford to by name-brand diet coke or pepsi? boyman says: July 11, 2007 at 12:59 am I agree with all the “fake comments” above. And, may I add, I do not think he will be that foolish to go naked on some beach knowing fully well how any paparazzi can take his picture and get it published–literally–around the world! jakeme2 says: July 11, 2007 at 1:21 am in some moment of reading too much in the newspaper i remember reading 1001 things about Princess Diana ~ of the information that’s stuck in my head was one point about her boys… “she didn’t want them to be circumcised like their father” (european aristocracy has always believed in circumcision) so that means that unlike the rest of the royal family Wills & Harry are uncut ~ a break with usual royal tradition… and in the case of this photo evidence that it’s not a photo of Willy’s willy. Nick says: July 11, 2007 at 1:27 am It’s a fake. Although circumcision has always been practised within the Royal Family in recent generations (Prince Philip, Prince Charles, Prince Andrew and Prince Edward are all cut), it is well known that Diana, Princess of Wales, vehemently insisted that William and Harry were not circumcised – and Prince Charles went along with that. A few years after Diana’s death, William was admitted for an overnight stay in hospital for what was described at the time as “a routine hernia operation”. There were suggestions that this was a euphemism for a circumcision but it has never been confirmed either way. Being an active sportsman and regularly mounting and dismounting horses for polo, it’s quite possible that William pulled something and required medical attention and that the reason given for his treatment was entirely genuine. mark d says: July 11, 2007 at 1:37 am okay, i hate to be a stickler for details, but i’ll like to clarify that male members of the royal family were traditionally cut–stemming from Q.Vic’s rule, but this practice was stopped by P.Diana for her two children. so jumps at claiming he should be uncut simply because he’s british is not quite the answer. besides, it’s not like all british men are uncut. LTP says: July 11, 2007 at 1:48 am The pic is fake. However, on the question of the princes being uncut. I thought I ran across an article saying, that by tradition, the men of the royal family of England are circumcised. I believe Queen Victoria started this tradition. There are rumors that the princes were circumcised after Diana’s death since she would not allow it. Circumcision is also common among royal males in Spain. ben from hamburg says: July 11, 2007 at 1:49 am it´s fake. and a really worse fake. Josh says: July 11, 2007 at 2:16 am It’s a real picture, just a prince look alike… RicanDavi says: July 11, 2007 at 2:41 am The head is totally pasted on, you can see the edges around it.. They could have picked a better body for him and yeah, he’s probably uncut. Drool says: July 11, 2007 at 2:55 am Not attractive fake or real 😛 benny says: July 11, 2007 at 3:02 am there is a ring of light going around the whole body it’s just a look alike M says: July 11, 2007 at 3:22 am Fake. There are photos of prince William at the recent concert for his mother that show him with his shirt open and he has chest hair. richard says: July 11, 2007 at 4:34 am dont know if its real but i have real picture of william and harry they are un cut John says: July 11, 2007 at 4:52 am Please. That Diet Rite can is from like 1983! And do they even HAVE Diet Rite in other parts of the world? BOOOOOO. God is in the details, even when doctoring naked photos. GorT says: July 11, 2007 at 5:24 am It’s simple… the prick is fake. flower888 says: July 11, 2007 at 6:12 am FAAKKE Byron says: July 11, 2007 at 6:12 am The picture, is of course a fake. However,my family are Jewish and the Princes are indeed circumcised, as I was circumcised by the same man as was my father, and my grandfather was circumcised by the same man that circumcised HRH the Prince of Wale’s. Lord E.B Romain, The Rt. Hon, the Viscount Anijar Blake says: July 11, 2007 at 6:19 am Obviously fake. His legs are disproportionate to his torso and upper half of his body – if no one’s mentioned that yet. Completely fake. Calz386 says: July 11, 2007 at 6:22 am Fake, more often than not the ears on people’s faces align with the eyes. In the photo the face is way too low to give the hint that the face was copied on and touch-ups were done. clemson says: July 11, 2007 at 7:08 am Fake. Like the heir to the throne would be drinking “Diet Rite”. phil2u says: July 11, 2007 at 7:20 am F A K E ! ! No Royal would touch a Diet Rite Cola danny says: July 11, 2007 at 8:41 am Fake for sure. His neck is WAY too big for his head! Billy says: July 11, 2007 at 10:24 am Very Fake!!! somebody crop out his P. William ‘s young (probably when he was something 14 or less.) pix over big body. how it possible? it is fake! no royals ever will reveal thier. expatstud says: July 11, 2007 at 7:37 pm Wow, I did not realise they still made Diet Rite–where can I get some? kobe says: July 11, 2007 at 10:16 pm Very BAD fake dickrebel says: July 12, 2007 at 12:20 am I just checked, diet rite is still sold, although since 2005 they have a new look and name “diet rite absolute 0”. They say on their site in the questions section about where to buy it, it says nationally in the us. No mention of international distribution. Unless the prince decided to get circumcized on the down low, *and* was sitting on an american beach, and was stupid enough to b e naked, and this was pre 2005, and he didn’t have chest hair, and he had the dubious “taste” for an awful diet cola that only sells to old diebetics in florida, than maybe it isn’t a fake, otherwise it surely is. John Strafe says: July 12, 2007 at 6:50 am Does anyone out there know if there are any naked pictures of Prince Harry? Just wondering. Even if they’re fake, that’s okay. JRF001 says: July 12, 2007 at 10:04 am Bitch please! That pic’s as fake as most porn actresses’ orgasms. Look at the water polo shots of William floating around the Internet; he has a nice patch of chest hair between his pecs. God bless PhotoShop. Poz_69 says: July 12, 2007 at 10:22 am OH, please, this is so fake. If William saw it, he would LHRHAO…. He definitely would be larger and uncut. Matthew says: July 12, 2007 at 5:00 pm It’s fake, but the statements about him being uncut is wrong. Boys in the British Royal family have always been circumcised. jamieUK says: July 12, 2007 at 5:53 pm Its obviously fake, but quite a good one at that – thing is I doubt he has been circumcised, the British Royal family keep their foreskins as was evident of the picture of Prince Charles cock taken in France a few years ago by paparazzi – it was not allowed to be shown in the UK but was published in France, quite a large member, does anyone have the pic or can QC please show us? THX! samUK says: July 12, 2007 at 6:17 pm Totally fake, looks nothing like him crocket says: July 12, 2007 at 9:44 pm FAKE!!! pitty – at least they could have pasted his royal face on some more hung dude!!! jc says: July 13, 2007 at 8:17 am It’s not him. Gosh this has been out years ago and has been disproved again and again. So many brits look like each other. Jorge says: July 14, 2007 at 2:07 am IT’S DEFINITELY FAKE! Number 1, All Royals are uncut! Number 2 Why would the Prince be drinking diet rite soda? Can’t afford the real stuff? Get REAL! Maggii says: July 21, 2007 at 8:12 pm fake body! doug says: September 28, 2008 at 6:52 pm fake , its toooo small Puddin says: September 28, 2008 at 11:47 pm Fake. He has a little dick like his dad. His whole is all stretched out from brother Ginger poking it every night – That is how the royals do it – Getting married but living for man sex. Isaac says: October 2, 2008 at 9:27 am completely fake. I read in a book that the princes are uncut, and this, though blurry, is obviously a cut cock. unfortuante, tho. i’d love to see the prince nude! ian says: October 5, 2008 at 7:52 am i want to believe this is real, hehe, ok we all know its fake but just the thought of have prince william naked has got me all hot and steamy!!! Hugh says: October 5, 2008 at 9:45 am IT”S A FAKE! 1. Europeans are uncut with the exception of the Jewish. 2. Diet Rite is a US brand soda. 3. Scotland Yard and the British Military security wouldn’t let any one get that close to Prince William or Harry. Bobby says: October 5, 2008 at 12:24 pm Oh, it’s real in a very fake way. Or rather, it’s fake in a very real way? QE2 says: October 5, 2008 at 2:05 pm *Hugh* 1. There are plenty of circumcised Europeans who are not Jewish 2. Diet Rite is available in lots of countries 3. The Papparazzi use telephoto lenses, ever see the picture of Prince Charles cock (French magazine, taken from long distance through window). rique says: October 5, 2008 at 8:55 pm were is the cock…i can only see a couple of balls…:p David Antonio Martinez says: October 6, 2008 at 12:42 am Not all Europeans were uncut. If you were born in Spain like I was during the reign of King Francisco Franco than you were required by royal law to be circumcised at birth. Dean says: November 25, 2008 at 5:07 am Just because they’re European doesn’t automatically mean they’re uncut. The royal family is known for penile mutilations, I’m sure Cabbage (aka QEthe2) would never have allowed the grandkids to go uncut. Thomas says: January 9, 2009 at 11:36 am Quite frankly I can’t even discern the dick from the balls… did anyone else notice the positioning looks off, as if the testicles are above the penis? Aharon says: January 31, 2009 at 5:55 am Am I the only one who thinks this looks like the body of an old man? He appears to have two dicks which , if they were combined would barely be enough for one normal one. That`s apart from all the other stuff listed here :0)) Donald says: September 9, 2009 at 1:19 am Although most Brits are uncut, British Royalty is CUT! Condessa says: November 2, 2009 at 3:30 am A fake, it all just looks wrong and weird. jersey says: January 31, 2010 at 4:04 pm thankfully fake…id like to think hot prince william has something much bigger than that James says: July 8, 2010 at 7:27 am That’s a fake… And it sooo obviously fake… Anyone who thinks that that is real is stupid… he would not be that stupid for starters Aamir says: July 22, 2010 at 4:28 am PRINCE IS UNCUT! google his picture. turns out the Queen was thoughtful, she wanted the prince to have ALL his manhood (foreskin) lol MPerty says: April 9, 2011 at 9:40 pm Not Much to Play wit… LOL Zac says: January 24, 2012 at 9:56 pm it look real to me and i think the picture should be deleted it is total disraspect Punny1941 says: March 24, 2012 at 2:58 pm Princess Diana, Prince Williams mother stated before her children were born, that if the baby was a boy, she would NOT follow Royal tradition of circumsizing hr boys..Therefore both William and Harry are NOT cut royalty2 says: July 7, 2012 at 10:42 am first, I thought that William and his brother were both uncut. This picture appears to have a circumcized penis. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.