Top 10 QComments
Every week, we bring the hot men and you bring the QComments. We've collected the 10 best. From botched circumcisions and barebacking to celebrity fakes and fisting, there's certainly enough controversial QComments to raise everyone's hair! So let's get to it.
We knew readers would have a lot to say when big-dicked Davin fucked lean Latin Mio at Chaos Men; not only because they're hot, but because they're barebacking. As long as there's an audience, barebacking's not going away. And even though studios test their models, there'll always be some risk involved which always raises passions from our viewers. SteveDenver started off a good discussion with a thoughtful, though incendiary comment:
Instead of "raw," couldn't we return to classic verbiage like "unprotected?" After seeing the documentary SEX POSITIVE about the advent of safe sex during the very early days of AIDS, and how the men who suggested it were decried as trying to censor the gay lifestyle, it seems we've come full circle. We know more than ever about STD transmission, yet unprotected sex is normalized. I would wager the owner of this site is HIV positive, because that is often the type of older guy who glamorizes unprotected sex: the ultimate denial.
Obviously SteveDenver feels strongly about barebacking. Yet in some ways, bareback sex seems like an ideal: it's sex without the fear of death, sex without barriers, sex as physically intimate as possible. Don't get us wrong, we're pro safe-sex, but consenting, responsible adults should be able to fuck however they choose. Diatribe responded directly to SteveDenver raising a much larger issue about gay health and pornography:
Every single time a post from this site features condomless sex, SteveDenver starts his predictable moaning and groaning. Give it up dude, you won't be changing these ADULTS's minds anytime soon. And you must love it because you obviously are still viewing it. Why does it seem that so many anti-"bareback" individuals are so prone to histrionics and slander - saying that any interest/ in or practice of condomless sex is tantamount to a suicide mission? I'm always curious if these individuals browbeat their parents who probably had unprotected sex to conceive them. Yes, there is a risk, (of varying degrees) of getting HIV from condomless sex (as well as with condoms) but adults get to choose what risks they are comfortable with. Ultimately, the point of all this moralizing is dumbfounding given how superficial it is. And I'm not just referring how "bareback" garners so much controversy, while "pre-condom" gets none, I am also talking about lack of mention of any broader issue of gay porn culture and it's corrosive psychological impacts on many minds that even make this "bareback" issue, an issue. Despite the fact that my experiences with many homosexual men has proven to me the effects of gay porn culture, with it insidious promotion of objectification, racism, ageism, shallowness, isolation, idolatry, addiction, and even depression, I'm under no delusion that I will change this by coming to queerclick or other gay porn venues and saying this all the time. I just look at the images for what they are - images, and ignore the sad drama that I know surrounds them.
QCX always caters to different sexual tastes, and while that's bound to raise controversy, that won't stop us, nor should it stop you from speaking your mind. Twincest's another porn trend that's gotten quite a bit of play around here. tommyboy responded to the outrage about Bel Ami's censored porn twins with this thoughtful nugget:
it makes no sense that we 'allow' and 'accept' porn which depicts people putting a glass jar up their ass and watching it break (1 guy 1 glass) girls eating shit (2 girls 1 cup), hardcore fisting videos, and bestiality videos which can be downloaded from almost anywhere,but TWINS!! The horror of watching two cute guys having mutual consenting pleasure with each other is just all too disturbing,,just because they are brothers..hmm.....
Most folks don't think twice about guys with uncut dicks (unless those two thoughts are 1] Wow, an uncut dick! and 2] I gotta get that uncut madness up in me!). But the dick of Randy Blue's Brandon caught einsirokk's attention for something other than its girth:
Still can't figure out why Americans are so fanatical about circumcision. This guy's cock has been completely mutilated (even more than the usual cut cock). And for what?
Yow! While Brandon's cock isn't your usual schlong, we don't think it's that unusual. On the same topic, Erik Johnson went to an old Ask QC post entitled, I Want My Foreskin Back and added his two cents on whether cut or uncut guys have it better:
Circumcision is one of the worst forms of sexual abuse. A lot of the men in this country are understandably in denial because they have no idea what they have lost. I just came back from Norway where my cousins live and none of them had ever even seen a mutilated penis or understand why someone would cut off any part of a baby's body. They also said they couldn't even imagine living without a foreskin, and that is the best part of the penis, they wondered how a person could even masturbate without a foreskin. In that the very act of masturbating is defined as sliding the foreskin up over the glands. How can you slide something over the glands that's not even there, and I said good point that's what sucks about it. If men in this county had any real idea of what they've lost they would be up in arms over it.
Of course, sometimes our QCommentors pay more attention to models' big heads rather than their little ones. Mike for instance, thought that Tommy D. XXX spent a little too much time eye-fucking the camera than he did fucking Justin Ryder.
I think Tommy is cute as all hell, and hot, and always finds even hotter guys to play with. YUMMY. But I sure wish he'd stop doing the Oprah move... staring directly into the camera. Like Oprah, you can tell he's thinking: "Let's make sure the focus is on me, here. Like we talked about. OK?"
Talking about head, New York Straight Men always gives some to their stud of the week. Last week's Maxwell had a face that reminded Shoco of a few things:
that Maxwell fellow has a weird look on his face. it's a look that both says: "I was kidnapped and now a guy is sucking on my cock = S.O.S." and "I was snubbed from my oscar nomination for best extra for my amazing appearance at Planet of the Apes".
And finally, we end with a celebrity round up. First, did you get a load of Bruno this week? Eminem certainly did. Several QCommentors recognized it as a publicity stunt for Sacha Baron Cohen's new film, but ged provided a little more background for the outrageous stunt:
Yeah who cares whether it was staged, it was freakin hilarious! For sure the reactions of the audience where real, and let's face it that's part of the joke. Of course they originally intended to land on Paris Hilton (imagine!) but she declined. The other thing is that people should realize that Eminen was NOT told how naked Bruno would be, so there was an element of surprise in how close that butt and crack got in his face (apparently in rehearsals Sasha wore shorts). So all in all, it was a great stunt, HAHA!!!
We actually found Borat hotter than Bruno (all that chest hair). But for the subtly-named gay guy that want ur huge juicy cock, he found our old celebrity fakes of Zac Efron so hot that... well... we'll just let him tell you:
every hot guy out there.... im a hot gay... im gay because of zac efron... now... i am craving for huge, juicy cocks......... if any guy out there... that wants to fuck me..... just say sooo...... im really hot and cute..... so i know that u want to fuck me....... ill suck ur cock all night long....... ooh yeah.... id love zac efron's cum.....im sure it tastes good..... oh yeah.... im finger fucking my ass right this moment....... i drink my own cum..... and it tastes good..... soo now im a gay who wants huge dicks shoved in my tight ass,..... i want to be fucked every night.... i want a shower sex..... oh yeah...... soooo fuck me now...
We hope he had lube and tissues while typing. Lastly, Thomas weighed in on a celebrity that's not so much famous as infamous—porn murder suspect, Marcus Allen. But instead of adding his own two cents, he threw in a couple of coins from funny woman, Kathy Griffin:
"One can only hope that when they arrive in hell, they are met by Dick Cheney and forced to do hard-core fisting with him." Maybe they'll even get a little tea-bagging action from Ann Coulter while they're down there... (Kathy Griffin ~ Everybody Can Suck It)
Geez, Thomas tell us how you really feel. And that goes for everyone—tell us what's on your mind this week and you'll most likely see it here next week.
9
QC Asians
Reader Comments
Your 2¢, in chronological order — add your comment below.
Every time I comment negatively about unprotected sex, I'm accused of being shrill and going on a diatribe. The responses to my comments can be harsh and mean. So be it. After working with public health and seeing men and women infected through unprotected behavior, and then the number it does on their head when health becomes an issue, I have to be a crusader for protecting self. Science is on my side, medicine is on my side.
As for unprotected sex being ideal: "Yet in some ways, bareback sex seems like an ideal: it's sex without the fear of death, sex without barriers, sex as physically intimate as possible." I once attended a safe-sex club in New York where everyone was having sex with everyone. One man told me, "We're not risking infection, so there's no fear." Everyone wants to have sex without fear, but what happens to a guy who eventually tests positive for HIV? It's a worst-case scenario, but not at all unusual.
As for the mind-set that drugs will save the day, drugs work for roughly 70% of those who take them and after two years drugs work for about half of those people. It takes real discipline for a drug regimen to work effectively, and it's a daily event. That is, if you can even get the drugs. The U.S. still has a "drug lotto," unless someone has gold-plated health insurance. HIV renders people uninsurable. It's not a cake-walk.
As for the comment about me posting against condomless sex and no comment about pre-condom sex, that was then, this is now.
The right wing doesn't have to wipe us out, we're doing a pretty good job; and it's heartbreaking. HIV infections are up 20% in the last decade and are expected to rise four-fold in the coming decade.
Thanks to QC for allowing me to post.
If you want to get technical, user "donnie" should get credit for the section in quotes. As for my Kathy Griffin addition, well, it was the first thing that came to mind in response! At least it got me on the board, right ;)
What 2 adults do in the privacy of their intimacy it's up to them...BUT, these sites that endorse, promote and condone unprotected gay sex are doing a dis-service to the gay community. After decades of stride, thousands of deaths and still no cure for AIDS, what is the point of thinking HIV and AIDS are not walk in the park? I do feel really upset when these sites hurt the minds and misinform young gay adults who need guidance. Shame on you for promoting unsafe sex. Why these sites do not come up with pictures and forums of these "actors" and models 5-10yrs from now to see how healthy they are? Self-destructing behavior and denial doesn't get you anywhere good. I am a 100% gay, masculine and proud of it. I live an active and healthy way of life with no need of drugs or worry about diseases because I was lucky enough to get well informed and protect myself. You can still live a life of great pleasure and lots of sex without putting one of others in danger. It's the mature and responsible thing to do...I do not buy porn from bareback studios either...
as fun as watching unprotected sex is it really does send a bad message... at 18 all i had ever seen was porn and the first time i had sex was bareback... and i feel so lucky now that through friends and responsible gay groups i saw how dumb that was and that i was lucky enough to walk away hiv- but some people dont. Just this weekend a 19yo was talking to me at the bar and before we hit off he revealed he was hiv+ how heartbreaking was that.... i felt so bad for him because that could have just as easily been me or if for condoms would have been neither of us. There is no education for gay kids in school, so they get on the internet and look at porn and after fast forwarding the fine print about responsible sex its a barbeack sperm fest with no repercusions... and i feel torn cause its fun to watch but this kind of porn is making young people think its okay and aids and condoms arent relevent cuz aids is in africa and guys can bareback whenever they want, and when ur young and alone who is going to tell you otherwise?
I can say I have watched a fair amount of porn and thats included watching some bareback sex it - it still doesnt - and never has - make me want to have unprotected sex. Just because you see something doesnt mean you are going to be brain washed into doing it
Using unprotected sex as a marketing plow to drum up business in a recession is immoral plain and simple. For the viewers, it makes no difference if the sex is "raw" since we cannot feel what the bottom or the top feel anyway. In addition, once a dick is in, it makes no difference visually if the top is wearing a condom or not . The only "bonus" is the sick mental thrill that some of us might have that one of the models will pay a heavy price for us to jack off. I ask the subscribers of the site how would they feel if they hear in a few years that super sexy Teo is HIV positive and he got the virus from performing on the site. I know I wouldn't want that on my conscious. In addition, just imagine the language in the releases that the models have to sign to perform "raw" and you will get the sense of how sick this is. Brian should be ashamed of this cynical marketing ploy.
You know, it's sad reading these comments. Really, it is. It's almost as if even the LGBTQQ community believes, along with the majority, that HIV/AIDS is exclusively a homosexual issue. Do you know how many straight studios do unprotected sex? It's actually rather weird to see straight porn that DOES have condoms, but no one says a damn thin about it! Really, explain to me what the risk is to either model who has tested negative for HIV/AIDS? If neither of them are infected with an STI, does it really matter whether they use a condom or not?
Truly, this is an excellent example of the result of panic propaganda and self-perpetuating homophobia.
These comments are just an example of typical homosexual myopia and one-noteism. The collective picks and one issue they and will dwell on on it until eternity, nevermind relevance or logic. Notice how superficial the analyses are, as I mentioned earlier. One commenter suggest having all the sex you want (with different partners of course), but hey just wear a condom. Wow, that's a psychologically/physically healthy lifestyle. Let's also just ignore the recent comments by Dr. Edward Green of Harvard University about condoms and the whole "risk compensation" thing. It doesn't strike me at all odd that there would be people who use a condom five out of ten times, but have a major sense of safety because of that condom use, and what's more, go about about how stupid "bareback" is and how promiscuity is ok and about sexual freedom. And what about the guy that brings a condom on a hook-up, gets major confidence just by virtue of having the condom, but never puts it on, feels guilty afterward, but continues the same trend? Don't mistake me, I am not against condoms, but I don't buy the propaganda that their use in the three-dimensional, non theoretical world is/will be all that it's claimed to be. The ONLY real foreseeable solution to the HIV/STD problem is a cure. And since I doubt that will happen anytime soon, I'm still wondering when more homosexuals will grow the balls to talk about the underlying gay cultural values that play a significant role in the spread of disease, as well as other behaviors that although linked to disease spread, can be separate and are more of a psychological ill, but which nevertheless are a part of pornography and negatively impacting minds. (eg. the aforementioned objectification, which often spirals down to ageism, racism, which often spirals down to addiction, isolation, depression)
BTW, what actual evidence is available showing that the amount of unprotected sex has INCREASED over time? I mean, that WOULD have to be shown to make any of these alarmist comments about "bareback" porn, sensible.