QueerClick

I'm cut myself and I love cut cock. I suppose it's down to personal preference.

it's so subjective--I personally find uncut cocks a huge turn-off--they always remind me of aardvarks...and personally, I find NOTHING sexy about aardvarks.

The main issue to focus on is what that dick can do--cut or uncut--stay focused on the pleasure.

just doesnt work. I had a friend who tried it and really regretted.
What it does is loosen the skin, a bit like what overweight people look like after they lose A LOT of weight. It is soggy and unattractive, not the tight sensitive foreskin that you know.
If you speak to your doctor, he will explain to you that foreskin is actually a special kind of skin tissue. Once it's gone, it's gone forever.

I too am interested in this question. I am cut and have always felt robbed. I hope someone has some experience with what this man has asked.

I'm currently doing it now! I use foreskinrestore.com's product, and as of now I have a lot more slack of skin. I can almost cover my head when I'm hard by rolling it up firmly. It is a lot easier when soft, but still isnt excess enough to cover relaxed w/o me holding it. Personally, circumcision is cruel and 'irreversable' and should be outlawed when performing them on an oblivious baby. Luck!

Cut cocks remind me of scarring, burnt skin and skin grafts. It's all about your personal preferences and what you like and don't like.

If you've chosen to restore your foreskin because you wish it hadn't been hacked off, good luck to you.

I've got to agree with the previous posts: It is all a matter of preference. Many people want what they don't have be it length, girth or foreskin. I love a nice clean cut cock. Most of the time I'm turned off by a foreskin and I can't wait for it to be pulled back and expose the beauty of the head. Just enjoy what the owner can do with his dick!

If you understood the foreskin and the purpose it serves, you probably would change your mind. The tip of the foreskin contains bundles of extremely sensitive nerves not found anywhere else on the genitals, which are mostly lost when someone is circumcised. Surrounding nerve endings must eventually substitute for the nerves lost in order to maintain the ability to orgasm, lending to a big difference in how intact males experience one compared to circumcised men. The foreskin also serves to keep the head of the penis moisturized and protected from chaffing and keratinization, which often leads to desensitization.

As for restoration, the T-Tape method certainly works, if you give it time and go slowly.

Your foreskin CANNOT be restored. All you will get is the appearance of a foreskin by stretching the skin of your penis so that it covers the glans, as a foreskin does. Anyone who claims that their product actually restores a foreskin is lying and I would avoid that product.
As for the circumcision argument, I am circumcised and am happy with my penis the way that it is. Purely from a hygiene point of view, cut cocks are easier to look after and keep clean. Anyone who's ever been faced with a cheesy uncut cock knows that. I'll happily play with an uncut cock, as long as it's clean and the foreskin rolls back from the glans completely. If the foreskin doesn't roll back completely there is likely to be alot of bacteria trapped under the foreskin causing all sorts of trouble.

Do you want your foreskin cover all the time or you want to be able to pull it off? Either way I think you shouldn't do it. I had my foreskin for 19 years (my parents don't believe in circumcision) and decide to took care of it last summer. I didn't cut it off, just asked the doctor to pull it down. After 19 years never seen that part, it hurt me pretty much. And now I don't see any profit that foreskin brings to me. I was very disgusted that I couldn't clean my glans for such long time. The foreskin now becomes the extra shaft which shrinks and causes me bad smell very fast. And when I pull the skin up, every time I cum I feel like my dick is being squeezed. I wish there was a way to cut them fast with no hurting and quick recovery.

This was pretty informative. Thanks to everyone for their contributions.

To the original poster, I was also cut at birth. I am very sad that my genitals were mutilated without my consent. I am a typical American who grew up thinking the natural penis was dirty and gross. Now that I have been with a lot of uncut men, I realize how much better the natural penis is. It isn't scared, dried out, desensitized, etc. The skin of an uncut penis feels so good when it's gliding during intercourse. It's so much easier to give a handjob to an uncut pnis because you don't need to constantly apply lube and/or saliva. It is so obvious that uncut men feel more pleasure with less work. They don't have to pump so hard during intercourse, and can actually focus on connecting with you emotionally.

I personally was cut very tight and I have pain during erections. I am going to start doing foreskin restoration. I have looked at various products, but I haven't bought one yet.

I saw this one the other day: http://www.foreskinrestore.com/main.html

It looks pretty impressive when you see what the website owner has done to restore. He doesn't have a lot of genital piercings though, which, for me, are a bit unattractive.

In any case, I have not tried any of these products, but I am going to start restoring soon. Google stuff like NORM for good info on restoration.

It is true that you cannot restore your actual foreskin, but you can cause shaft skin to grow. If you do it right, it looks virtually just like an intact penis.

I say go for it. I have been stretching it for years and its a slow process, not using any devices. i don't know what a real foreskin feels like on my own, but the stretching gives me a clue as to what it feels like and keeps me going. which device is best, not sure i hin kits personal preferance

Wow, there's a lot of haterade going on here. To the OP, just listen to the other guys who have or are restoring. The other posters are not answering your question: They're just shooting arrows from the peanut gallery. You may want to google forums for restoration, too. I bet you'll find a lot more info there. Best of luck.

Aaron, don't define hatred down. There are plenty of really horrid comments on the Internet and defining a simple difference of opinion as "hatrerade" depreciates the term.

One problem is another definition, that of "restoration." I would prefer the term "mimic" or something equally accurate (but that would likely hurt sales as the "hope" of actual physical restoration sells whatever it is they're selling).

Self-administered restoration is medically impossible, as some have noted. Your orginal foreskin is a unique type of tissue that serves several functions. You won't be duplicating the original tissue (specifically, the nerves throughout, the elasticity, and the thickness, or rather, thinness, of the original tissue). Many of the biological functions are simply lost forever during circumcision (a few of those functions only last a matter of days or weeks after birth, you're never gonna get THAT back).

However, some have said they have been pleased with the results of their "project." As long as you're realistic about what you're going to be able to achieve (an "approximation" of a foreskin), you have the discipline to stick with whatever method you choose (and, importantly, to not overdo it and damage anything) and realize if it does NOT work out the way you planned you may have altered the appearance of your penis in an unsatisfactory way ... I dunno, that's a lot of "ifs" I personally wouldn't be willing to take on.

Just for the record, I believe circumcision for non-medical or non-religious reasons is mutilation.

Wow you guys... when we were babys this decision was made for us. So making personal digs is just stupid. If you would like to e-mail my mom and tell her she tortured, scared, and mutilated me thats one thing but i had nothing to do with my own circumcision.. so how about removing the attitude and answering the guys question! Im cut and have no issue at all with it. I dont fel like a victum as some would want me to on here. I would just say be careful before you do anything. It doesnt seem like it could ever be restored to the way it was before. Just make sure its going to look good and its what you really want. It would be terrible to stretch it out and it look different then both cut and uncut and ur stuck with a weird new kind of foreskin.

"I believe circumcision for non-medical or non-religious reasons is mutilation." FTFY, DoorHold

This is a good question and it's one I've wondered about myself. Thanks for asking, Kaden.

Although you can't get your "foreskin" back, it can be that not all of your foreskin tissue was cut away. You can cause this skin to grow in the same way that your skin can grow enormously if you get obese.

From everyone I have spoken with about restoring, your penis becomes way more sensitive again, and your penis head stops being dry and rough. Also, the skin does do glide again. I have not started restoring yet, but I hear that you have to make sure the device you use puts equal tension on both your shaft skin and your "inner foreskin" (which is the skin between your penis head and the circumcision scar). If you pull only on shaft skin, then it can become, as some posters have said, too saggy and odd looking.

I hear you have to be patient and it takes years, but check out some websites, and you will see some restored penises that look totally uncut. You cannot tell at all that it was circumcised at one point.

I think restoring will improve my sex life greatly just by loosening the skin. My erections always feel so tight. If you tilt my penis even slightly to the side or up/down, it hurts.

I personally believe that circumcision is mutilation, but if anyone wants to do anything to his penis, that is his right. You can cut all the skin off your penis if that's what you want to do, but it is clearly a violation of a baby's rights to circumcise him. There are literally millions upon millions of men who want their natural penis back and were given no choice in the matter. If you are cut, there is no reversing it. If you are uncut, you can always, always choose to get circumcised.

i was cut at 20 by my choice because i preferred the look and didn't find sex that pleasurable with the foreskin rolling back and forth over the head of the penis during insertion and removal. In fact, it felt like nothing at all. So after careful consideration i decided to go through with it. It doesn't hurt to get it done. You aren't bed ridden and i didn't need to take any pain killers etc. I took one pill on the first night to help me sleep, but otherwise, after two weeks i was back in the saddle so to speak.

Sensation wise, I haven't noticed any difference what so ever. I'm not any less sensitive than I was before, but sex is much more pleasurable (for me) because the head of my penis is in direct contact with whatever I happen to stick it in. So I disagree entirely with the argument that one is more sensitive in than the other.

Am I happy with it? Yes.. i'm thrilled. I vividly remember camping and having a smelly crotch after a day of hiking, which meant no sex with my partner after the first day because it was a bit embarrassing, until i could wash up, or have a shower. I don't care what anyone says, uncut cocks, after a day of activity, are kinda rank. It's fine, it's normal, but I didn't want to deal with it anymore.

I also agree with Paul. Stop lashing out at cut guys who are happy with their penis. Their parents (most likely) made that decision and they can't go back even if they wanted to.

If you are considering restoring, be warned, you will get something that may resemble foreskin, but it will not regrow nerve endings. Also the foreskin has a sphincter (sounds gross, but isn't) that creates that sealed appearance on the end. Restoring will not give you back that. At best you will have a tube/barrel of shaft skin that you've pulled and stretched to cover the head of your penis... that's it... and that isn't foreskin and you will still be circumcised, like it or not.

^^^

If someone is happy with his circumcision (at birth or by choice), that's fantastic. There are millions of us who were cut against our will who are not happy with it. I think it's much better to have parents like yours, who decided not to cut you. You got to make your own choice based on your personal preference.

As for uncut cocks being "rank" after a day of activity, all I can say is that I wouldn't want to suck a circumcised penis after an entire day of hiking either. Vaginas can also be "rank" after a day of heavy activity, as can assholes, but we don't surgically alter them ... we wash them before sex. There is nothing wrong with needing to wash up before sex, and frankly, as a cut man, I would never have someone suck my cock after an entire day of sweaty, exhausting hiking until I had washed up.

Anyway, it doesn't matter. If you are happier, that is fantastic. I mean that, honestly. It's just that many of us are very bitter because we feel mutilated against our wills, and we find that our penises look injured, scared, and dried out.

Circumcision is one of the worst forms of sexual abuse. A lot of the men in this country are understandably in denial because they have no idea what they have lost. I just came back from Norway where my cousins live and none of them had ever even seen a mutilated penis or understand why someone would cut off any part of a baby’s body. They also said they couldn’t even imagine living without a foreskin, and that is the best part of the penis, they wondered how a person could even masturbate without a foreskin. In that the very act of masturbating is defined as sliding the foreskin up over the glands. How can you slide something over the glands that’s not even there, and I said good point that’s what sucks about it. If men in this county had any real idea of what they’ve lost they would be up in arms over it.

Very nice site!