
You know how it goes. You QComment, we QCollect the best and share them with the rest. This week's QCollection includes a round of QC readers fighting over their favorite porn stars' hair, disagreements over sexual politics, and a bevy of readers who share their revelations about some of last week's hottest studs.

Hair and body grooming always seem to raise reader ire. Some men love it. Some hate it. Our resident porn-reviewer, Chinpoko, is one of the latter. He disliked the feathered Farah Fawcett look of Island Stud's Barry. He said "Honestly, I think Barry's going to be super hot after 4 years (and a haircut)." But Bo screamed out in defense of Farah's, err, we mean, Barry's hairstyle:
NOOOOO don't cut Barry's hair! It's hot. It's so tedious if you're a gay guy who likes long hair on men, because you almost never see it in porn. So keep the f*cking barber away from him---you've got 99% of all the other guys in porn to enjoy ;)
Bo is right, of course. Maybe long hair's just not Chinpoko's style but our cocky reviewer has more than enough clipped men to shake his stick at. But elsewhere one QCommenter's gripes about the lack of pubic hair in two separate posts really riled up enoughisenough. In College Dudes 24/7's post of Bryson Hughes & Trent Blade QCommenter Mike said, "The body hair shaving is out of control!!! Why? I feel like I'm looking at eight year old boys fucking. HURL!" enoughisenough soon stepped in to vehemently disagree with Mike.
Mike - that's an outrageous comment. You're obviously projecting 8 year olds' onto these men - that's your problem.
If you prefer hairy bodies - fine - you're entitled to. But don't you dare suggest that those who might enjoy these men are paedophiles.
Hair or not - these are men - and there's no doubt about that. Please leave your offensive comments to yourself. People should be free to shave their pubic hair if they so desire.
Then, once again, in Corbin Fisher's Dawson Fucks Ty, QCommenter Mike said, "It could have been a hot video, but they're both too shaved. Not really into watching two little boys." After that, enoughisenough decided that enough was enough and actually asked the QC editors to step in and silence Mike:
Mike - stop your f*cking outrageous comments.
QC editor - can you please remove him. The lack of pubic hair on these men does not make them "little boys".
If Mike is seeing little boys when he looks at these men, then that's his problem and he should seek treatment, rather than accusing QC viewers of being paedophiles.
Enough is enough. This hairy vs smooth debate has moved from boring to offensive.
Whenever a hot porn actor decides to shear off his bush, we tend to get QComments from people like Mike calling the boys pre-pubecent and, thus, insinuating that their fans are all pedophiles; but we don't take it seriously and definitely don't think anyone should get too offended. We tend to chuckle it off as a hyperbolic way of preferring men au naturale.
And even if man-scaping has the added benefit of making men look younger, what's wrong with that? The models are all over 18 anyway, so there's no harm, no matter what Mike or anyone says. But maybe Mike would prefer the guys at Hairy Boyz or Butch Dixon. Meanwhile, enoughisenough, have you checked out the smooth studs at QC Twinks recently? There's really so much to love.
More
"Top 10 QComments"